{4F805597-AC32-42F4-9EE2-BAD88CE3B8B2} 8. Epilogue
Search Advanced
Home Aliyah & Absorption Partnerships with Israel Jewish Zionist Education Regions 
You are here :   Jewish Zionist Education Educational Resources More Educational Resources Leadership Guides Running a Discussion 8. Epilogue
About Us
Training Programs
Educational Shlichut
Experiences In Israel
Focus Areas
Regional Partnerships
Educational Resources
eEducation-Jacontact
Our Bookshop
E-Helpdesk
More Educational Resources
Leadership Guides
Media Studies
Teacher Outlines
Recommended Publications
Azure
Compelling Content
R & D
8. Epilogue

Epilogue


None of our suggestions is magic. A discussion is a highly complex group exchange. Be flexible, be patient. Be as aware and observant as possible. Listen closely. Experience will help you to control and direct a discussion.

A belief in open exchange and an eagerness to learn are the most basic qualities you can bring and impart to your group. If you can demonstrate that fruitful discussion needs to be more than a debate or an occasion to defend one's views, and that learning from each other and having the ability to change one's mind is not a sign of weakness or inferiority, but rather a sign of maturity, then you have made an important contribution.

Note on Language

Your group members will express themselves using language, but language is a tool that is often used very sloppily in speaking or writing - or both. There is a tempting tendency to hide behind clich?s and vague generalities; such language reflects our thinking, too. This is something of which you should be aware and point out in a constructive manner when you hear it in your group - or bring in examples from the outside, if you wish.

A short essay by George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, has yet to be surpassed in its analysis of the role and power of language in the exchange of ideas and the creation of thought. We recommend that you read it, and keep it in mind as you listen closely to your group members express themselves.


Fig. 1. Discussion Movement



How animated was the discussion?  
How did the subject affect the group?  
Who decided how the discussion should be conducted?  
Was the discussion atmosphere cooperative
or competitive between group members?
 
What exactly was required from
the discussion?
 
What was its purpose?  
Did the original subject or purpose
of the discussion go through any major changes?
 


Fig. 2 Leadership Style and Group Dynamics


Positive Roles
Initiated  
Gave examples  
Asked for examples  
Gave information  
Asked for information  
Gave positive reactions or opinions  
Gave restatement of another's contribution  
Gave clarification, synthesis, summary  
Gave constructive comment / input on group's movement (or lack of it)  
Asked for constructive comment /input on group's movement  
Encouraged, acknowledged contribution  
Encouraged, acknowledged contribution  
Relieved group tension  

Please add your own ideas if you wish!

Negative Roles
Acted with aggression, hostility  
Made self-confessions  
Showed defensiveness  
Was competitive  
Pleaded for pet idea  
Sought sympathy  
Horsed around  
Sought status, approval, popularity of group  

 

Pulling it all together - ideas for follow-through with the charts:

You can add here ideas like: "encouraged personal or inter-group conflict" (as opposed to "reconciled").

Use this last box (negative role) to identify some of the things which are happening in the group, and impacting negatively on your activities (see: discussion movement), on which you might be able to impact by applying more positive role intervention in your discussions


Send to A Friend
  
Print
Back to Top
Info Center Resources Ask us Issues that matter
Home Site Map Privacy
Thursday 04 December, 2008 (c) All rights reserved to the Jewish Agency יום חמישי ז' כסלו תשס"ט