|
This exercise is designed to help participants learn to listen to others by asking them to try and assimilate the views of others during a discussion.
The leader chooses a subject which is likely to produce a number of viewpoints among the participants. At the start of the discussion the leader poses the problem. For example, he or she might give two sides of an issue in the Arab-Israel conflict or religious/secular issue.
The leader asks participants to list initial reactions and first points of view on paper. The leader then allows for a discussion bringing out points of disagreement and having participants explain their points of view.
The leader should stresses that everyone should pay particular attention to, and note down points of view which are different from their own, by taking notes and trying to understand the other’s position.
Once all have had the chance to express their opinions, the leader closes the discussion by saying:
“We are now going to try an experiment. While you may all feel strongly about your views, I’d like to ask you now to look at your notes about the alternative points of view.
Do you understand those views? Take a minute to think about the points expressed by others.”
After a few minutes the leader asks the group to continue the discussion, this time defending the opinion most unlike his/her own. The discussion, if possible, should continue for about ten minutes, or until each member has a chance to defend a new point of view.
Review
The activity can be summed up with a discussion of the following points:
- Were you able to defend another’s position convincingly? Why, or why not?
- During the first part of the discussion did you truly listen openly to the points of others, or were you constantly defending and gaining “ammunition” for your point of view?
- Is it possible for people of vastly different views to engage in open, honest communication? Why, or why not?
- Were all or some of your views changed as a result of this exercise?
As a follow-up to this activity, the group might be reconvened at a later date to have a discussion of the original issue.
- Are people more willing to listen to each other?
- Is communication greater? |